The course will tend firstly to illustrate the thypes and the basic principles of the criminale trial, in order to re-establish a systematic contesxt, made hars by the many reforms of recent years. Later the main institutes and rules related to criminal trial law concerning work safety will be examinated, through the analysis of the case law in this matter and the solution of pratical cases.

The course will develop the following matters, under the specific point of view of the criminal trial concerning work safety

the criminal procedural system - Consistutional principles of the criminal law - Jurisdiction and prosecution - The subjects of the trial - Procedural acts and penalities - The general principles on evidence - the evidence - Preliminary investigations - Preliminary hearing - Special proceeding - The judgement of first istance

Criminal labor law

A) Knowledge and understanding - The student must show to have  a  suitable knowledge of the sources of the Italian criminal trial and the ability of understanding of its constitutional and international principles and he also must show his understanding of its translation offered by  the criminal procedure laws.

B) Applying knowledge and understanding - The student must show to be able to apply his  knowledge by formulating possible interpretative solutions on controversial issues relating to criminal procedural law.

C) Making judgements - The student must show to be able to integrate knowledge of  criminal procedure law institutes with those of the constitutional and European right, as well with those of similar disciplines (es. judicial system, penitentiary right, civil and administrative trial right)  and to make critical judgments on the basis of  this interdisciplinary platform.

D) Communication skills - The student must show to be an active part in seminars, groupworks and in any planned activities  in the living law laboratories , he must also show to  be able to explain clearly and effectively  the reached conclusions on the argumentative plan, dealing with teachers and with colleagues.

E) Learning skills - The student must show to have developed the learning skills  to continue the study  of the criminal procedure on his own  and that he has the means to  understand the main criticalities of the system  end possible reforms to amend them. 

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars, conferences and meetings on the subject themes of legislative reforms and jurisprudential contrasts.

The teaching material and specific communications from the lecturer can be found, together with other supporting activities, inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Teaching

Lectures - Seminars - The living law Laboratories

Attendance

None

Course books

G. Conso-V. Grevi-M. Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, VIII ed., 2016, limited to: chapter I (paragraphes from 1 to 38), chapter II (paragraphes fra 8 to 10; from 28 to 34), chapter III, chapter V, chapter VI (paragraphes from 1 to 18 and from 28 to 32); chapter VII.

S. Dovere, I procedimenti definitori nella tutela penale della salute e della sicurezza sul lavoro, in AA. VV., Trattato di procedura penale, a cura di G. Spangher –  vol. VII, Modelli differenziati di accertamento, tomo II, Utet, 2011, p. 761 ss. 

Assessment

The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Attendance

None

Course books

G. Conso-V. Grevi-M. Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, VIII ed., 2016, limited to: chapter I (paragraphes fra 1 to 38), chapter II (paragraphes from 8 to 10; from 28 to 34), chapter III, chapter V, chapter VI (paragraphes from 1 to 18 and from 28 to 32); chapter VII.

S. Dovere, I procedimenti definitori nella tutela penale della salute e della sicurezza sul lavoro, in AA. VV., Trattato di procedura penale, a cura di G. Spangher –  vol. VII, Modelli differenziati di accertamento, tomo II, Utet, 2011, p. 761 ss. 

Assessment

The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.