The course aims to provide the fundamental historical-critical and methodological tools for the knowledge of Italian stagey literature, i.e. mastery of the essential concepts that can guide the student to the study of dramaturgical phenomena through the reading and, if appropriate, viewing some of the major works.

The course will provide a general framework of the stagey Italian literature from 16th to 19th century, by illustrating the main phenomena, authors and the most representative works. The first part of the course will be devoted to the Renaissance periodo, with particular attention to Machiavelli and his masterpiece the Mandragola. The second part of the course will focus on the study of the tragic genre, together with the rediscovery of the Poetics of Aristotle during the Humanistic and Renaissance era thanks to translations both in Latin and in vernacular, and commentary. Then the tragic genre in the 18th century until the early 19th century will be analysed through some of the most representative texts of Alfieri and Foscolo, their cultural and political aspects at the tournant des lumières.

None

Students will acquire fundamental knowledge of the Italian stagey literature of the Renaissance period and the main works. They will be able to understand, analyze and interpret a text; they will develop explanatory and argumentative skills, study methodology, ability to formulate their own judgments.

At the end of the course, students are expected to have acquired:

Knowledge and understanding

- knowledge of the topics discussed during the course;

- knowledge of the birth and development of the theatrical production of the XVth-XVIth centuries, with special attention to the main authors, the different genres, and finally to the main classical and vulgar sources;

- ability to orient themselves critically in the study of theatrical literature from synchronic and diachronic point of view.

Applied knowledge and understanding

- knowledge and understanding of the specific characteristics of major works and issues relating to stagey literature;

- ability to understand texts through in-depth and timely textual analysis (paraphrase, linguistic commentary, stylistic and possibly metric).

Autonomy of judgment

- ability to acquire skills in theatrical literature that enable the development of independent judgments.

Communication skills

- ability to communicate clearly and comprehensively the skills acquired in the field of Italian stagey literature;

- ability to argue issues and problems in this specific area of study by using appropriate language.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Handouts, slides, videos and other teaching materials will be made available by the teacher at the end of the course ion the Moodle platform.

Teaching

Classes, seminars. Students may be required to read during the course in order to attend some lessons with proper preparation.

Attendance

Compulsory attendance for the 80% of the classes hours amount.

Course books

In addition to the materials used during the classes, students are required to study:

1. N. MACHIAVELLI, Mandragola: the whole text and commentary. Recommended editions: N. Machiavelli, Teatro, Introduzione e commento di D. Fachard, Roma, Carocci, 2013; or N. Machiavelli, Opere letterarie, a cura di L. Blasucci, Milano, Adelphi, 1964; or N. Machiavelli, Teatro: Andria, Mandragola, Clizia, a cura di P. Stoppelli, Roma, Salerno, 2017.

2. G. FERRONI, I generi teatrali e La commedia in Id., Storia delle letteratura italiana. Dal Cinquecento al Settecento, Torino, Einaudi, 1991, vol. II, pp. 110-115; and with specific attention to the sections devoted to the works of Machiavelli (ivi, pp. 31-59); and Ludovico Ariosto (ivi, pp. 61-90).

3. V. ALFIERI, Saul selected parts: dedicatory letter; Act II; Act IV, sc. 3; Act V. Recommended edition: V. ALFIERI, Opere, introduzione e scelta di M. Fubini, testo e commento a cura di A. Di Benedetto, Milano-Napoli, Ricciardi, 1977, pp. 977-78, 990-1001, 1006-15, 1028-35 [available at the University Library].

4. A. DI BENEDETTO, Vittorio Alfieri, in Storia della letteratura italiana diretta da E. Malato, VI. Il Settecento, Roma, Salerno Editrice, 1998, pp. 935-52, 964-71, 975-78, 985-86  [available at the University Library].

5. U. FOSCOLO, Ajace selected parts: Act II, sc. 10-11; Act V, sc. 2-6. Recommended edition: U. FOSCOLO, Opere, edizione diretta da F. Gavazzeni, con la collaborazione di M.M. Lombardi e F. Longoni, 2 voll., Torino, Einaudi-Gallimard, 1994-1995, vol. I. Poesie e tragedie, pp. pp. 250-63, 291-301 [available at the University Library].

6. M.A. TERZOLI, Ugo Foscolo, in Storia della letteratura italiana diretta da E. Malato, VII. Il primo Ottocento, Roma, Salerno Editrice, 1998, pp. 379-90, 448-53 [available at the University Library].

Assessment

Oral examination. This choice was made in order to enhance the oral argumentative skills of individual students in relation to a highly technical discipline and which requires the possession of a specific lexicon.

"Excellent" mark: the student must show possession of good critical and in-depth skills; the ability to orient with sure mastery of the subject within the main themes covered during the lesson, also establishing, if necessary, links between different fields and themes of the discipline; outstanding ability to use the technical lexicon of discipline.

"Good" mark: the student must demonstrate possession of a mnemonic knowledge of the main contents of the discipline; minimal critical and linking capacity between the main themes of the discipline with the use of the appropriate lexicon.

"Sufficient" mark: the student must demonstrate minimal knowledge of the fundamentals of the discipline, even if there are some educational gaps, as well as the use of language that is not entirely appropriate.

"Negative" mark: difficulty of orientation of the student with respect to the topics dealt with in the exam; training gaps; the use of inappropriate language and/or the inability to use the technical lexicon of the discipline.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Teaching

Self-directed learning.

Attendance

Students are required to contact the professor to receive general information and to agree on the program.

Course books

In addition to the programm for attending students, it is required to study:

- F. BAUSI, Machiavelli commediografo e narratore, in Id., Machiavelli, Roma, Salerno, 2005, pp. 270-301 [available at the University Library].

- S. FERRONE, T. MEGALE, Il teatro, in Storia della letteratura italiana diretta da E. Malato, VI. Il Settecento, Roma, Salerno Editrice, 1998, pp. 821-37, 854-61, 868-70 [available at the University Library].

- U. FOSCOLO, Ajace introduction, in U. FOSCOLO, Opere, edizione diretta da F. Gavazzeni, con la collaborazione di M.M. Lombardi e F. Longoni, 2 voll., Torino, Einaudi-Gallimard, 1994-1995, vol. I. Poesie e tragedie, pp. 788-96 [available at the University Library].

Assessment

Oral examination. This choice was made in order to enhance the oral argumentative skills of individual students in relation to a highly technical discipline and which requires the possession of a specific lexicon.

"Excellent" mark: the student must show possession of good critical and in-depth skills; the ability to orient with sure mastery of the subject within the main themes covered during the lesson, also establishing, if necessary, links between different fields and themes of the discipline; outstanding ability to use the technical lexicon of discipline.

"Good" mark: the student must demonstrate possession of a mnemonic knowledge of the main contents of the discipline; minimal critical and linking capacity between the main themes of the discipline with the use of the appropriate lexicon.

"Sufficient" mark: the student must demonstrate minimal knowledge of the fundamentals of the discipline, even if there are some educational gaps, as well as the use of language that is not entirely appropriate.

"Negative" mark: difficulty of orientation of the student with respect to the topics dealt with in the exam; training gaps; the use of inappropriate language and/or the inability to use the technical lexicon of the discipline.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.