DIALECTICS OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP ONTOLOGY. SUBJECTIVITY, PHILOSOPHY AND POLICY BETWEEN MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY. The course of History of Philosophy, for Psychology students, in this academic year aims to address (in its first part) the theme relating to the relationship between Being and Politics, in the contemporary contingency of existence. During the lessons I will carry out thought exercises through trajectories and philosophical decompositions, crossings of languages ??between specialized knowledge prone to human sciences and political philosophy and ontology, sociology and anthropology, hermeneutic protocols and cultural materials that seek, in a horizon of " ontology of current events ”, to reveal the different models, paradigms and normative facts in the philosophical, ontological, political and ethical-juridical discourse of modernity and in the frontiers that include and exclude subjects and societies, the self, the you and the we with respect to the conditions of freedom, justice and social reproducibility in the contemporary quadrant, along the impervious paths of the compossible recta life always dialectically connected to the metamorphic conflict of subjectivities intrigued in the experience of time and space, between anthropological and ontological statutes -politics that connote the agonic and competitive relationship between the human and things, forms of life between natural and artificial, between history and world, between order and disorder, in the extraordinary ulteriority of occasions, of the event of being taking shape in the humanity of man in his irreducible plural singularity, of a politically instituted social being whose difference is embodied in the conflict that generates it and pervades it in its immanence. In its second part, the course, starting from a critical review of the phenomenologies of the crisis, of the contemporary scenarios and of the political ontology of the conflict, will deal with three levels of argument that make each other complementary. In the first, through some of Georg Simmel's original philosophical essays he will insist on why we understand the dynamic flow, in time and space, of life and history: of the fallible, reciprocal self, which is never totally possessed with itself same as identity, reliable and secure. As for Hegel, also for Simmel the ego is constituted by the relationship with the other. The plots of this tangle mean that life, society, philosophy, politics, science and art, that is culture, can make us re-known as individual subjects of desire, power and knowledge, in our limit, in a non-depoliticizing ontology of the human and social, in which the reciprocity principle rises to the constitutive dimension of the restless bond of the human, of the becoming of being, to which, in the ineffable and chiasmatic contingency of the living, one can escape from the fact that the human being is an imperfect, missing being who lives in desire, at the same time equal and different from all the others. In the second and third, it is proposed to reconstruct some of the main cultural, philosophical and political transits within the work of Theodor W. Adorno, Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jürgen Habermas on specific questions of the role of the Bildung, of the philosophies of Europe and of the fate of the West, considering these three masters of Western philosophical thought as fundamental and unavoidable points of reference for the critical understanding of the contemporary human and political condition. Furthermore, moving from the morphological crisis of the political sphere in our contemporary world, the main intent is to critically problematize the link between subjectivity, politics and domination through an analytical comparison of the semantics and configurations that subjectivity assumes in the Modern through a hermeneutic framework that it involves the philosophies of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Jürgen Habermas and the politicity that goes through them, to then join the relevance and consequences of this comparison with the reinterpretation developed by Miguel Abensour of the possible relationship between critical theory and political philosophy.

1. Human destiny.

2. Dialectics of the human and ontology of social relationship.

    Between Modern & Contemporary.

3.Order, conflict, social institution. The Machiavellian paradigm.

4. Anthropology of visibility, conflict, recognition.

    (Rousseau, Smith, Hegel, Simmel).

5. Scenarios of modern subjectivity (Simmel).

6. Subjectivity, public action, ethics and justice (Heller).

7. The just and justice between philosophy, ethics, politics and law (Ricœur).

8. Critical Theory, Social & Political Philosophy (Habermas and Honneth).

9. Subjectivity between opportunity, politics and freedom (Masullo).

10. Bildung, Kultur and Halbbildung (Gadamer and Adorno).

11. Subjectivity, politics, domination (Hegel, Habermas, Abensour).

12. Europe and the West (Gadamer and Habermas).

None.

·  In relation to the discipline the student will have to show:

·  Knowledge and understanding:

·  - knowledge of the fundamental themes of the history of philosophy exposed in class and deepened in the textbooks and understanding of its fundamental concepts in their cultural, philosophical, political and psychological effects (see Training objectives);

·  Knowledge of the philosophical forms and of the metamorphoses and cultural, historical, socio-political and psychological dynamics exposed in class and deepened in the textbooks and understanding of the processes that have configured them.

·  - understanding of the constituent elements of the relationship between subjectivity, philosophy, politics and ontology of the social relationship between classic and contemporary in relation to the subject area and the program carried out.

·  Applied knowledge and understanding:

·  - ability to orientate oneself in the modern and contemporary cultural, philosophical, political, sociological and psychological debate and to understand the elements that today structurally consolidate the knowledge of the fundamental problems of the history of philosophy also in the educational, philosophical and psychological fields.

·  Making judgments:

·  - ability to take an independent position with respect to the main cultural, philosophical, historical-political, sociological and psychological issues of the contemporary critical debate on modern and contemporary thought.

·  Communication skills:

·  - ability to adequately communicate what has been learned in the form of university-level study; ability to transmit and communicate the fundamental aspects and principles of the History of Philosophy declined in its inescapable disciplinary relationship for the training of the psychology student.

·   

·  Ability to learn

·  - on the basis of the knowledge acquired through the course, the student must be able to independently build in-depth courses and understand which readings and experiences can help him in this regard.

·  In relation to the discipline, therefore, the student must show in a mature way, possession:

·  • mastery of basic knowledge;

·  • understanding of the fundamental concepts of the discipline;

·  • the ability to use knowledge and concepts to reason according to the logic of the discipline.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

During the course, in the second semester, interdisciplinary integrative seminars will be held by the professor who holds the prof. Antonio De Simone and the experts on the subject prof. Luciano Massi and PhD. Alessandra Peluso.

Teaching

Frontal lessons, tutorials and scientific-educational seminars integrating in-depth study. 

Attendance

Participation in lessons is not mandatory but strongly recommended recommended for the development of learning logic and methodologies

Course books

-  ANTONIO DE SIMONE, Essere e politica. Dialettica dell’umano, Mimesis, Milano 2020.

-  ANTONIO DE SIMONE, Bildung, Europa e Occidente. Cultura, filosofia e politica tra Hegel e Habermas, Morlacchi Editore, Perugia 2020.

Assessment

Oral exam.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Teaching

Non-Attending Students have to conform to the indications provided by the program and the course books of the vademecum.

Course books

   

-  ANTONIO DE SIMONE, Essere e politica. Dialettica dell’umano, Mimesis, Milano 2020.

-  ANTONIO DE SIMONE, Bildung, Europa e Occidente. Cultura, filosofia e politica tra Hegel e Habermas, Morlacchi Editore, Perugia 2020.

Assessment

Oral exam.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.