Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo / Portale Web di Ateneo


FOOD SECURITY LAW
DIRITTO DELLA SICUREZZA ALIMENTARE

FOOD SECURITY LAW
DIRITTO DELLA SICUREZZA ALIMENTARE

A.Y. Credits
2019/2020 6
Lecturer Email Office hours for students
Angelo Marinaccio in the 30 minutes before the lessons and in the 60 minutes after the lesson itself. It is also possible to arrange receptions on site or by e-mail communication.

Assigned to the Degree Course

Law (LMG/01)
Curriculum: PERCORSO COMUNE
Date Time Classroom / Location
Date Time Classroom / Location

Learning Objectives

Allow the student to acquire sufficient knowledge, including critical and problematic, between domestic law, European Union law and international treaties with regard to food law.

Program

Food products between domestic law, European Union law and international multilateral treaties; principles of food law; the market for agricultural and food products; quality systems; production and marketing of food products; the controls.

Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)

Knowledge and understanding (knowledge and understanding)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam has: - knowledge and understanding of the legal sectors of reference; - knowledge of the fundamental norms of food safety law, as they emerge in the national and community regulations; - ability to understand goals, contexts and consequences of legislative choices inspired by food safety; - ability to understand jurisprudential judgments related to food law.

Ability to apply knowledge and understanding (applying knowledge and understanding)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam has: - the ability to interpret and apply national and community regulations; - the ability to research on paper and through databases in order to investigate topics of legal interest. The acquisition of the aforementioned requirements will be verified through the following methods: exercises on case law; intermediate tests and final examinations of the individual parts of the course.

Making judgments Students

Who have passed the food safety law exam should have the ability to apply the reference standards to concrete cases in the light of the continuous innovations that food law is experiencing.

Communication skills (communication skills)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam should have: ability to face and resolve the legal issues underlying the food law according to logical legal paths consistent and compatible with the reference system.

 

Learning skills (learning skills)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam should have:

acquired the juridical methodology to face the new problems that the social and normative evolutions pose daily to the jurist.

Teaching Material

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Supporting Activities

Seminars and exercises on practical cases


Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment

Teaching

Teaching methods Frontal lessons; exercises on case law; seminar activities

Attendance

Use of national and Community legislation of reference.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text of Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza e Laura Salvi, Compendio di diritto alimentare, Cedam, Milano, ul. ed.

Assessment

This method allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the display methods, the evaluation and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be evaluated by formulating three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not reach any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied understanding and understanding";

• 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding" and "independent judgment";

• 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment" and "communication skills";

• 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Additional Information for Non-Attending Students

Attendance

Use of national and Community legislation of reference.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text of Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza e Laura Salvi, Compendio di diritto alimentare, Cedam, Milano, ul. ed.

Assessment

This method allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the display methods, the evaluation and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be evaluated by formulating three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not reach any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied understanding and understanding";

• 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding" and "independent judgment";

• 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment" and "communication skills";

• 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

« back Last update: 24/10/2019

Condividi


Questo contenuto ha risposto alla tua domanda?


Il tuo feedback è importante

Raccontaci la tua esperienza e aiutaci a migliorare questa pagina.

Se sei vittima di violenza o stalking chiama il 1522

Il 1522 è un servizio pubblico promosso dalla Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento per le Pari Opportunità. Il numero, gratuito è attivo 24 h su 24, accoglie con operatrici specializzate le richieste di aiuto e sostegno delle vittime di violenza e stalking.

Posta elettronica certificata

amministrazione@uniurb.legalmail.it

Social

Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo
Via Aurelio Saffi, 2 – 61029 Urbino PU – IT
Partita IVA 00448830414 – Codice Fiscale 82002850418
2023 © Tutti i diritti sono riservati

Top