The course aims to deepen the principles of economic criminality and aspects of criminal law protection of the public economy, industry and commerce (Book II, Title VIII, Articles 499-518 of the Criminal Code).

• Concepts of economic crime, penalties, confiscation.
• Criminal liability of individuals: own crime, guarantee positions, risk assessment, delegation of functions, de facto administrator, liability of collective bodies.
• Liability of entities for facts of crime: interest or advantage of the entity, organizational fault, compliance programs.
• The types of offences that protect the public economy, industry and commerce (Book II, Title VIII, Articles 499-518 of the Penal Code).

• Constitutional law
• Criminal law I

Knowledge and understanding

• the criteria for the legitimation of economic criminal law 
• concepts of economic criminal law  of the code-based cases for the protection of the public economy, industry and trade
• Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to research, interpret, enforce criminal law

Autonomy of judgment

• assessing and managing regulatory and jurisprudential complexity

Making judgements

• offer elements of criticism and novelty for interpretation and regulatory creation 

Communication skills

• to draft written and oral comments on judgments and legal opinions
• to describe and evaluate the empirical data and its application in the light of legislative, jurisprudential and doctrinal reforms and changes

Learning skills

•  basic notions for permanent updating

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars, conferences, exercises, writings, videos, blogs, podcasting. Moot court (http://people.uniurb.it/AlessandroBondi/Corso_Diritto_Penale/Obiettivo_corso.html)

Teaching

Lessons, Mind Mapping 3D, guided discussions (Socratic method), exercises, videos, written papers on jurisprudential issues (max 4 pages), exposition (Moot court)

Attendance

Participation in lectures, seminars, exercises, conferences (unjustified absences max 3 lessons)

Course books

• A. Alessandri- S. Seminara, Diritto penale commerciale, vol. I, I principi generali, G. Giappichelli, ult. ed.
• G. Fornasari, Delitti contro l'economia pubblica, l'industria e il commercio, ESI, ult. ed. 

Assessment

The examination includes an oral test to verify the necessary preparation through the reasoned explanation of the institutions and the links between them, also assessing the achievement of an adequate expressive and organizational capacity of speech (three or more questions in 'double step': member of the commission and professor of criminal law).

The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30: insufficient level of competence. The candidate does not achieve any of the expected learning outcomes under 'knowledge and understanding';
• 18-20/30: sufficient level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes expected under 'knowledge and understanding';
• 21-23/30: fully sufficient level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding' and 'applied knowledge and understanding';
• 24-26/30: level of competence: good. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding' and 'autonomy of judgement';
• 27-29/30: very good level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding', 'autonomy of judgement' and 'communication skills';
• 30-30 cum laude: excellent level of competence. The candidate fully achieves the expected learning outcomes under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding', 'independent judgement', 'communication skills' and 'learning ability'. 

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Course books

• Alessandri-Seminara, Diritto penale commerciale, vol. I, I principi generali, G. Giappichelli, ult. ed.
• G. Fornasari, Delitti contro l'economia pubblica, l'industria e il commercio, ESI, ult. ed. 

Assessment

The examination includes an oral test to verify the necessary preparation through the reasoned explanation of the institutions and the links between them, also assessing the achievement of an adequate expressive and organizational capacity of speech (three or more questions in 'double step': member of the commission and professor of criminal law).

The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30: insufficient level of competence. The candidate does not achieve any of the expected learning outcomes under 'knowledge and understanding';
• 18-20/30: sufficient level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes expected under 'knowledge and understanding';
• 21-23/30: fully sufficient level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding' and 'applied knowledge and understanding';
• 24-26/30: level of competence: good. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding' and 'autonomy of judgement';
• 27-29/30: very good level of competence. The candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding', 'autonomy of judgement' and 'communication skills';
• 30-30 cum laude: excellent level of competence. The candidate fully achieves the expected learning outcomes under 'knowledge and understanding', 'applied knowledge and understanding', 'independent judgement', 'communication skills' and 'learning ability'. 

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.