The course deals with the system of the so-called special procedures forsesee by the code of criminal procedure, illustrating: the purposes for which they were introduced and strengthened, the peculiarities of their structure, their procedural legal discipline.

The aim is to develop: the awareness of the values that characterize our procedural system, the appropriateness of the technical solutions developed by the lawmaker and their harmony with the principles of the Constitution and of the European Convention on Human Rights, the ability to autonomously interpret legislative innovations, identifying critical profiles and possible reforms.

Particular attention will be paid to the issues at the center of the political-legislative debate and to the interpretative issues on which jurisprudential conflicts are recorded.

The alternatives to the ordinary trial in the constitutional framework.

Consensual, authoritative, mixed proceedings.

The abbreviated judgment.

The plea bargain.

The probation.

The immediate judgment.

The direct judgment.

Criminal law (1st part)

A) Knowledge and understanding - The student must show to have  a  suitable knowledge of the sources of the Italian criminal trial and the ability of understanding of its constitutional and international principles and he also must show his understanding of its translation offered by  the criminal procedure laws.

B) Applying knowledge and understanding - The student must show to be able to apply his  knowledge by formulating possible interpretative solutions on controversial issues relating to criminal procedural law.

C) Making judgements - The student must show to be able to integrate knowledge of  criminal procedure law institutes with those of the constitutional and European right, as well with those of similar disciplines (es. judicial system, penitentiary right, civil and administrative trial right)  and to make critical judgments on the basis of  this interdisciplinary platform.

D) Communication skills - The student must show to be an active part in seminars, groupworks and in any planned activities  in the living law laboratories , he must also show to  be able to explain clearly and effectively  the reached conclusions on the argumentative plan, dealing with teachers and with colleagues.

E) Learning skills - The student must show to have developed the learning skills  to continue the study  of the criminal procedure on his own  and that he has the means to  understand the main criticalities of the system  end possible reforms to amend them. 

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Guided tutorials.
Seminars of study.

Teaching

Lectures, characterized by dialogue teaching, in order to develop in the students the ability to use a technically appropriate and rigorous legal language, to critically analyze legislative solutions and jurisprudential orientations, to resolve concrete issues relating to the topics dealt with, interacting with the teacher and colleagues .

In-depth seminars will be organized on legislative and jurisprudential topics, with the participation of legal practitioners (magistrates, lawyers, police officers, experts who play the role of experts and technical consultants).

Participation in criminal hearings will also be organized, at the end of which the main applied institutes and the issues addressed will be discussed.

Innovative teaching methods

Debate

Flipped classroom

Course books

One of the following manuals, in the latest edition:

Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, Wolters Kluwer - Cedam, chapter VI

Camon, Cesari, Daniele, Di Bitonto, Negri, Paulesu, Fondamenti di procedura penale, Wolters Kluwer - Cedam, chapter XVI

Assessment

The exam is comprehensive of bot the modules of criminal procedure (1st and 2nd module) 
The exam foresee a written and an oral part.
The written test success is only needed to access the oral test, and it is aimed to ascertain the knowledge of the fundamentals of the matter.
The oral test is composed by at least three questions: it will verify the knowledge and the understanding of the dynamics and legal institutions of criminal procedure. The completeness of information, the correct use of procedural terminology, the ability to critically analyze legal institutions, to identify the most problematic issues, to apply the concepts learned to concrete cases will also be assessed.

The evaluation criteria and the scale of grades are the following:

less than 18/30: insufficient competence level. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18/20: sufficient competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21/23: satisfactory competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24/26: good competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27/29: very good competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30/30 with honors: excellent competence level. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Course books

One of the following manuals, in the latest edition:

Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, Wolters Kluwer - Cedam, chapter VI

Camon, Cesari, Daniele, Di Bitonto, Negri, Paulesu, Fondamenti di procedura penale, Wolters Kluwer - Cedam, chapter XVI

Assessment

The exam is comprehensive of bot the modules of criminal procedure (1st and 2nd module) 
The exam foresee a written and an oral part.
The written test success is only needed to access the oral test, and it is aimed to ascertain the knowledge of the fundamentals of the matter.
The oral test is composed by at least three questions: it will verify the knowledge and the understanding of the dynamics and legal institutions of criminal procedure. The completeness of information, the correct use of procedural terminology, the ability to critically analyze legal institutions, to identify the most problematic issues, to apply the concepts learned to concrete cases will also be assessed.

The evaluation criteria and the scale of grades are the following:

less than 18/30: insufficient competence level. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18/20: sufficient competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21/23: satisfactory competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24/26: good competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27/29: very good competence level. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30/30 with honors: excellent competence level. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.